Abstract
Using detailed information from the Canadian interbank payments system and liquidity-providing facilities, we find that despite sustained increases in market-rate spreads, the increase in banks’ willingness to pay for liquidity during the 2008–2009 financial crisis was short-lived. Our study suggests that high-frequency distress indicators based on demand for liquidity offered by central banks can be complementary, and perhaps even superior, to market-based indicators, especially during times and in markets where uncertainty in the economic environment may lead to lack of meaningful information in prices due to absence of trading.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 243-275 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | American Economic Journal: Microeconomics |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Crisis Management in Canada: Analyzing Default Risk and Liquidity Demand during Financial Stress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver