Abstract
Ferreras's bicameral governance proposal for the corporation contributes to a recent wave of interest in democratizing the workplace. In this article, I connect this to a related ongoing movement in favor of the stakeholder approach to corporate purpose. I argue that this connection sheds light on, and may provide remedies for, some issues with the bicameral proposal: first, the risk of gridlock between the two parties in the dual governance structure; second, the indeterminacy of good management when shareholder primacy is abandoned. But I also note that shareholder primacy emerged spontaneously from structural features of the economy, so that special protection for the “good” firms is warranted, and that other key limitations of a market economy cannot be alleviated fully by democratizing the firm.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 243-257 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Politics and Society |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Jun 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Political Science and International Relations
Keywords
- bicameralism
- corporate social responsibility
- stakeholder theory
- workplace democracy