TY - GEN
T1 - Why am I Still Seeing This
T2 - 7th AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2024
AU - Castleman, Jane
AU - Korolova, Aleksandra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Recently, Meta has shifted towards AI-mediated ad targeting mechanisms that do not require advertisers to provide detailed targeting criteria. The shift is likely driven by excitement over AI capabilities as well as the need to address new data privacy policies and targeting changes agreed upon in civil rights settlements. At the same time, in response to growing public concern about the harms of targeted advertising, Meta has touted their ad preference controls as an effective mechanism for users to exert control over the advertising they see. Furthermore, Meta markets their “Why this ad” targeting explanation as a transparency tool that allows users to understand the reasons for seeing particular ads and inform their actions to control what ads they see in the future. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of Meta's “See less” ad control, as well as the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We conduct a large-scale study, randomly assigning participants the intervention of marking “See less” to either Body Weight Control or Parenting topics, and collecting the ads Meta shows to participants and their targeting explanations before and after the intervention. We find that utilizing the “See less” ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics, and that the control is less effective for some users whose demographics are correlated with the topic. Furthermore, we find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria, and did not inform users why ads related to the topics they requested to “See less” of continued to be delivered. We hypothesize that the poor effectiveness of controls and lack of actionability and comprehensiveness in explanations are the result of the shift to AI-mediated targeting, for which explainability and transparency tools have not yet been developed by Meta. Our work thus provides evidence for the need of new methods for transparency and user control, suitable and reflective of how the increasingly complex and AI-mediated ad delivery systems operate.
AB - Recently, Meta has shifted towards AI-mediated ad targeting mechanisms that do not require advertisers to provide detailed targeting criteria. The shift is likely driven by excitement over AI capabilities as well as the need to address new data privacy policies and targeting changes agreed upon in civil rights settlements. At the same time, in response to growing public concern about the harms of targeted advertising, Meta has touted their ad preference controls as an effective mechanism for users to exert control over the advertising they see. Furthermore, Meta markets their “Why this ad” targeting explanation as a transparency tool that allows users to understand the reasons for seeing particular ads and inform their actions to control what ads they see in the future. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of Meta's “See less” ad control, as well as the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We conduct a large-scale study, randomly assigning participants the intervention of marking “See less” to either Body Weight Control or Parenting topics, and collecting the ads Meta shows to participants and their targeting explanations before and after the intervention. We find that utilizing the “See less” ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics, and that the control is less effective for some users whose demographics are correlated with the topic. Furthermore, we find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria, and did not inform users why ads related to the topics they requested to “See less” of continued to be delivered. We hypothesize that the poor effectiveness of controls and lack of actionability and comprehensiveness in explanations are the result of the shift to AI-mediated targeting, for which explainability and transparency tools have not yet been developed by Meta. Our work thus provides evidence for the need of new methods for transparency and user control, suitable and reflective of how the increasingly complex and AI-mediated ad delivery systems operate.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105040245115
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105040245115#tab=citedBy
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105040245115
T3 - Proceedings of the 7th AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2024
SP - 255
EP - 266
BT - Proceedings of the 7th AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2024
A2 - Das, Sanmay
A2 - Green, Brian Patrick
A2 - Varshney, Kush
A2 - Ganapini, Marianna
A2 - Renda, Andrea
PB - AAAI press
Y2 - 21 October 2024 through 23 October 2024
ER -