TY - JOUR
T1 - Who Gives, Who Takes? “Real America” and Contributions to the Nation–State
AU - Abascal, Maria
AU - Angel Centeno, Miguel
N1 - Funding Information:
Thanks to Christopher Felton for research assistance and to Denia Garcia, Sergio Galaz-Garcia, and the participants of the ASEN Conference (March 2012, LSE) and the Theorodology Workshop (April 2012, Princeton) for constructive feedback. Maria Abascal gratefully acknowledges support from the Population Studies and Training Center at Brown University, which receives funding from the NIH (P2C HD041020).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 SAGE Publications.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Although service to the nation–state features in academic and lay understandings of patriotism, claims of patriotism are rarely examined alongside contributions to the nation–state. The present study examines four behaviors—military enlistment, voting, monetary contributions, and census response—to evaluate the claim that certain parts of the United States, and specifically the communities of “real America,” contribute more than others to the country overall. Consistent with the words of several electoral candidates, ruralness, religiosity, political conservatism, and gun culture collectively identify a distinctive set of communities where residents are both more likely to report “American” as their ancestry and to vote for Republican presidential candidates, including Donald Trump. However, visual and statistical evidence undermine the claim that these communities contribute more than other parts of the country. Instead, and in several respects, these communities make smaller contributions to the nation–state than one would expect based on other characteristics. The findings undermine divisive claims about a “real” America that gives more than its “fair share.”.
AB - Although service to the nation–state features in academic and lay understandings of patriotism, claims of patriotism are rarely examined alongside contributions to the nation–state. The present study examines four behaviors—military enlistment, voting, monetary contributions, and census response—to evaluate the claim that certain parts of the United States, and specifically the communities of “real America,” contribute more than others to the country overall. Consistent with the words of several electoral candidates, ruralness, religiosity, political conservatism, and gun culture collectively identify a distinctive set of communities where residents are both more likely to report “American” as their ancestry and to vote for Republican presidential candidates, including Donald Trump. However, visual and statistical evidence undermine the claim that these communities contribute more than other parts of the country. Instead, and in several respects, these communities make smaller contributions to the nation–state than one would expect based on other characteristics. The findings undermine divisive claims about a “real” America that gives more than its “fair share.”.
KW - Americanness
KW - nation state
KW - nationalism
KW - polarization
KW - real America
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032366234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032366234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0002764217720966
DO - 10.1177/0002764217720966
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032366234
SN - 0002-7642
VL - 61
SP - 832
EP - 860
JO - American Behavioral Scientist
JF - American Behavioral Scientist
IS - 8
ER -