Who do you think you are? Reading, authority, and book reviewing

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Book reviewing depends on the mutual indulgence of authors and reviewers, a community of scholarship inflected by assumptions about scholarly authority. The author reflects on this community as he prepares to move from reviewer to reviewed with the appearance of his own first book.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-15
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Scholarly Publishing
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Media Technology

Keywords

  • Academia
  • Book reviewing
  • Expertise
  • Scholarly community

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who do you think you are? Reading, authority, and book reviewing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this