When bad things happen to good feedback: Exacerbating the need for self-justification with self-affirmations

Hart Blanton, Joel Cooper, Ian Skurnik, Joshua Aronson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

In numerous self-affirmation studies, Claude Steele and colleagues have demonstrated that self-affirmations reduce the need to justify dissonant behavior even when the affirmation is unrelated to the dissonance-evoking action. However, research has not sufficiently examined the impact of reaffirming self-aspects that are related to the dissonance. The authors argue that relevant affirmations of this sort can make salient the standards that are violated in the course of dissonant behavior, thereby increasing dissonance and the need for self-justification. In a laboratory study using the induced-compliance paradigm, it was demonstrated that dissonance can be exacerbated by reaffirming standards that are violated in the course of the dissonant behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)684-692
Number of pages9
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1997

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'When bad things happen to good feedback: Exacerbating the need for self-justification with self-affirmations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this