TY - JOUR
T1 - What Is the Contribution of City-Scale Actions to the Overall Food System's Environmental Impacts?
T2 - Assessing Water, Greenhouse Gas, and Land Impacts of Future Urban Food Scenarios
AU - Boyer, Dana
AU - Ramaswami, Anu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2017/10/17
Y1 - 2017/10/17
N2 - This paper develops a methodology for individual cities to use to analyze the in- and trans-boundary water, greenhouse gas (GHG), and land impacts of city-scale food system actions. Applied to Delhi, India, the analysis demonstrates that city-scale action can rival typical food policy interventions that occur at larger scales, although no single city-scale action can rival in all three environmental impacts. In particular, improved food-waste management within the city (7% system-wide GHG reduction) matches the GHG impact of preconsumer trans-boundary food waste reduction. The systems approach is particularly useful in illustrating key trade-offs and co-benefits. For instance, multiple diet shifts that can reduce GHG emissions have trade-offs that increase water and land impacts. Vertical farming technology (VFT) with current applications for fruits and vegetables can provide modest system-wide water (4%) and land reductions (3%), although implementation within the city itself may raise questions of constraints in water-stressed cities, with such a shift in Delhi increasing community-wide direct water use by 16%. Improving the nutrition status for the bottom 50% of the population to the median diet is accompanied by proportionally smaller increases of water, GHG, and land impacts (4%, 9%, and 8%, systemwide): increases that can be offset through simultaneous city-scale actions, e.g., improved food-waste management and VFT.
AB - This paper develops a methodology for individual cities to use to analyze the in- and trans-boundary water, greenhouse gas (GHG), and land impacts of city-scale food system actions. Applied to Delhi, India, the analysis demonstrates that city-scale action can rival typical food policy interventions that occur at larger scales, although no single city-scale action can rival in all three environmental impacts. In particular, improved food-waste management within the city (7% system-wide GHG reduction) matches the GHG impact of preconsumer trans-boundary food waste reduction. The systems approach is particularly useful in illustrating key trade-offs and co-benefits. For instance, multiple diet shifts that can reduce GHG emissions have trade-offs that increase water and land impacts. Vertical farming technology (VFT) with current applications for fruits and vegetables can provide modest system-wide water (4%) and land reductions (3%), although implementation within the city itself may raise questions of constraints in water-stressed cities, with such a shift in Delhi increasing community-wide direct water use by 16%. Improving the nutrition status for the bottom 50% of the population to the median diet is accompanied by proportionally smaller increases of water, GHG, and land impacts (4%, 9%, and 8%, systemwide): increases that can be offset through simultaneous city-scale actions, e.g., improved food-waste management and VFT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031819005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031819005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.7b03176
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.7b03176
M3 - Article
C2 - 28902497
AN - SCOPUS:85031819005
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 51
SP - 12035
EP - 12045
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 20
ER -