What is normative necessity?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter explores Fine’s suggestion that the ethical facts supervene on the natural facts, not as a matter of metaphysical necessity, but rather as a matter of normative necessity. The first part develops an argument against the metaphysical supervenience of the ethical, the main premises of which are ethical non-naturalism and Fine’s essentialist analysis of metaphysical necessity. The second part defends an analysis of normative necessity according to which P is normatively necessary iff P would have been the case no matter how the non-normative facts had been. The last part argues that the basic principles of ethics as the non-naturalist conceives them are indeed normatively necessary in this sense.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMetaphysics, Meaning, and Modality
Subtitle of host publicationThemes from Kit Fine
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages205-233
Number of pages29
ISBN (Electronic)9780199652624
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 19 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Keywords

  • Kit fine
  • Metaethics
  • Metaphysical necessity
  • Modality
  • Necessity
  • Non-naturalism
  • Normative necessity
  • Supervenience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is normative necessity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this