Abstract
We argue that almost all empirical social science research should employ a mode of argumentation called “Inference to the Best Explanation” (IBE). While elements of IBE appear widely, it is seldom consciously described, leading to confusion about the role that evidence plays in social science claims. We describe what IBE is and its implications for the evaluation of studies of various types—from quantitative description, to traditional regression studies, to work with modern causal identification. We contend that debates over the merits of these approaches should be understood as debates over the relative weight scholars place on quality of explanations, the quality of evidence, and the bridge between the two. Seeing the process this way helps highlight the merits of different research traditions and explains common pathologies of the same. Informed by IBE, we clarify the motivation for certain advice in regression studies and offer guidance on best practice.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1587-1599 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Politics |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- causal inference
- description
- exploration
- knowledge
- philosophy of social science