"What did You Say, and Who do You Think You Are?" How Power Differences Affect Emotional Reactions to Prejudice

Manuela Barreto, Naomi Ellemers, Susan T. Fiske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Three studies examine how power differences between targets and sources of prejudice affect targets' emotional reactions to prejudice. Study 1 first demonstrates that people do not expect powerful others to be prejudiced. Studies 2 and 3 then examine what happens when targets encounter prejudice, as a function of the source's power. Targets notice and recall prejudiced statements from powerful sources, irrespective of whether they are personally dependent on the source. However, results also demonstrate that personal dependency on the source determines how much targets attend to and are emotionally affected by prejudice. Emotional reactions to prejudice as a function of source power were mediated by negative expectations about future interactions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)477-492
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Social Issues
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '"What did You Say, and Who do You Think You Are?" How Power Differences Affect Emotional Reactions to Prejudice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this