TY - JOUR
T1 - Well-intended policies
AU - Buera, Francisco J.
AU - Moll, Benjamin
AU - Shin, Yongseok
N1 - Funding Information:
✩ We thank the two associate editors, Diego Restuccia and Richard Rogerson, and two anonymous referees for exceptionally thorough and helpful comments. Buera and Shin gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Science Foundation (SES-0820318 and SES-0946647). The usual disclaimer applies. * Corresponding author at: Washington University in St. Louis, United States. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (F.J. Buera), [email protected] (B. Moll), [email protected] (Y. Shin).
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - Market failures provide a rationale for policy intervention. But policies are often hard to alter once in place. We argue that this inertia can result in well-intended policies having sizable negative long-run effects on aggregate output and productivity. In our theory, financial frictions provide a rationale for providing subsidized credit to productive entrepreneurs to alleviate the credit constraints they face. In the short run, such targeted subsidies have the intended effect and raise aggregate output and productivity. In the long run, however, individual productivities mean-revert while individual-specific subsidies remain fixed. As a result, entry into entrepreneurship is distorted: The subsidies prop up entrepreneurs that were formerly productive but are now unproductive, while impeding the entry of newly productive individuals. Therefore aggregate output and productivity are depressed. Our theory provides an explanation for two empirical observations on developing countries: idiosyncratic distortions that disproportionately affect productive establishments, and temporary growth miracles followed by growth failures.
AB - Market failures provide a rationale for policy intervention. But policies are often hard to alter once in place. We argue that this inertia can result in well-intended policies having sizable negative long-run effects on aggregate output and productivity. In our theory, financial frictions provide a rationale for providing subsidized credit to productive entrepreneurs to alleviate the credit constraints they face. In the short run, such targeted subsidies have the intended effect and raise aggregate output and productivity. In the long run, however, individual productivities mean-revert while individual-specific subsidies remain fixed. As a result, entry into entrepreneurship is distorted: The subsidies prop up entrepreneurs that were formerly productive but are now unproductive, while impeding the entry of newly productive individuals. Therefore aggregate output and productivity are depressed. Our theory provides an explanation for two empirical observations on developing countries: idiosyncratic distortions that disproportionately affect productive establishments, and temporary growth miracles followed by growth failures.
KW - Financial frictions
KW - Idiosyncratic distortions
KW - Industrial policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871923033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871923033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.red.2012.10.008
DO - 10.1016/j.red.2012.10.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84871923033
SN - 1094-2025
VL - 16
SP - 216
EP - 230
JO - Review of Economic Dynamics
JF - Review of Economic Dynamics
IS - 1
ER -