Weak Lensing in the Blue: A Counter-intuitive Strategy for Stratospheric Observations

  • Mohamed M. Shaaban
  • , Ajay S. Gill
  • , Jacqueline McCleary
  • , Richard J. Massey
  • , Steven J. Benton
  • , Anthony M. Brown
  • , Christopher J. Damaren
  • , Tim Eifler
  • , Aurelien A. Fraisse
  • , Spencer Everett
  • , Mathew N. Galloway
  • , Michael Henderson
  • , Bradley Holder
  • , Eric M. Huff
  • , Mathilde Jauzac
  • , William C. Jones
  • , David Lagattuta
  • , Jason S.Y. Leung
  • , Lun Li
  • , Thuy Vy Thuy
  • Johanna M. Nagy, C. Barth Netterfield, Susan F. Redmond, Jason D. Rhodes, Andrew Robertson, Jürgen Schmoll, Ellen Sirks, Suresh Sivanandam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The statistical power of weak lensing measurements is principally driven by the number of high-redshift galaxies whose shapes are resolved. Conventional wisdom and physical intuition suggest this is optimized by deep imaging at long (red or near-IR) wavelengths, to avoid losing redshifted Balmer-break and Lyman-break galaxies. We use the synthetic Emission Line (“EL”)-COSMOS catalog to simulate lensing observations using different filters, from various altitudes. Here were predict the number of exposures to achieve a target z ≳ 0.3 source density, using off-the-shelf and custom filters. Ground-based observations are easily better at red wavelengths, as (more narrowly) are space-based observations. However, we find that SuperBIT, a diffraction-limited observatory operating in the stratosphere, should instead perform its lensing-quality observations at blue wavelengths.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number245
JournalAstronomical Journal
Volume164
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Weak Lensing in the Blue: A Counter-intuitive Strategy for Stratospheric Observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this