Abstract
Adopting early dry season fires in African conservation areas has been proposed as ecologically desired and a means of generating sufficient carbon revenues for their management. We interrogate available peer-reviewed information on the ecology and biogeochemistry of fire in Africa to offer an informed perspective on the full implications of the proposal. We conclude that there is insufficient evidence that a shift to early dry season fires will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, that resultant biodiversity and ecosystem service outcomes may not be desired, and that adopting a single burning regime limits the use of fire to achieve a diverse range of goals.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 112568 |
| Pages (from-to) | 226-233 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Nature Sustainability |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Global and Planetary Change
- Food Science
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Ecology
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Urban Studies
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Viability and desirability of financing conservation in Africa through fire management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver