Abstract
Russia's intervention in the Georgian-South Ossetian conflict has highlighted the need to rigorously examine trends in the public debate over the use of force in Russia. Approaching this debate through the prism of civil-military relations, we take advantage of recent methodological advances in automated content analysis and generate a new dataset of 8000 public statements made by Russia's political and military leaders during the Putin period. The data show little evidence that military elites exert a restraining influence on Russian foreign and defence policy. Although more hesitant than their political counterparts to embrace an interventionist foreign policy agenda, Russian military elites are considerably more activist in considering the use of force as an instrument of foreign policy.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 319-343 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Small Wars and Insurgencies |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2009 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Political Science and International Relations
Keywords
- Civil-military
- Content analysis
- Document classification
- Elites
- Russia
- Use of force