TY - JOUR
T1 - Updated geographic range maps for giraffe, Giraffa spp., throughout sub-Saharan Africa, and implications of changing distributions for conservation
AU - O'connor, David
AU - Stacy-Dawes, Jenna
AU - Muneza, Arthur
AU - Fennessy, Julian
AU - Gobush, Kathleen
AU - Chase, Michael J.
AU - Brown, Michael B.
AU - Bracis, Chloe
AU - Elkan, Paul
AU - Zaberirou, Abdoul Razazk Moussa
AU - Rabeil, Thomas
AU - Rubenstein, Dan
AU - Becker, Matthew S.
AU - Phillips, Samantha
AU - Stabach, Jared A.
AU - Leimgruber, Peter
AU - Glikman, Jenny A.
AU - Ruppert, Kirstie
AU - Masiaine, Symon
AU - Mueller, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
We express our sincere gratitude to the Great Elephant Census, Vulcan Inc., Kenya Wildlife Service, Grevy's Zebra Trust, Giraffe Conservation Foundation and Northern Rangelands Trust Wildlife-Conservancy Management Monitoring System, who helped provide the data for this update. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the Twiga Walinzi team of giraffe researchers in northern Kenya, whose vital giraffe research provided data for this update. In addition, we want to thank the following governments, organisations and individuals who have helped with this research: Governments and Wildlife Authorities of Botswana, Tanzania, Angola, Kenya, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Zimbabwe, and South Sudan, Loisaba Conservancy, Namunyak Conservancy, Lewa Conservancy, Northern Rangelands Trust, Sarara Camp, Mpala Research Centre, Bristol Zoological Society, Falk Grossmann, Soqui Mendiguetti, Paul Peter Awol, Orad Eldar, Blaise Mandaba, Ian Craig, Juliet King, Antony Wandera, Geoffrey Chege, Zeke Davidson, Cloe Pourchier, Osiris Doumbe, and the Robert Bosch Foundation, The Leiden Conservation Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Mammal Review published by Mammal Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Giraffe populations have declined in abundance by almost 40% over the last three decades, and the geographic ranges of the species (previously believed to be one, now defined as four species) have been significantly reduced or altered. With substantial changes in land uses, loss of habitat, declining abundance, translocations, and data gaps, the existing geographic range maps for giraffe need to be updated. We performed a review of existing giraffe range data, including aerial and ground observations of giraffe, existing geographic range maps, and available literature. The information we collected was discussed with and validated by subject-matter experts. Our updates may serve to correct inaccuracies or omissions in the baseline map, or may reflect actual changes in the distribution of giraffe. Relative to the 2016 International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List Assessment range map, the updated geographic range maps show a 5.6% decline in the range area of all giraffe taxa combined. The ranges of Giraffa camelopardalis (northern giraffe) and Giraffa tippelskirchi (Masai giraffe) decreased in area by 37% (122432 km2) and 4.7% (20816 km2) respectively, whereas 14% (41696 km2) of the range of Giraffa reticulata (reticulated giraffe) had not been included in the original geographic range map and has now been added. The range of Giraffa giraffa (southern giraffe) showed little overall change; it increased by 0.1% (419 km2). Ranges were larger than previously reported in six of the 21 range countries (Botswana, Ethiopia, Mozambique, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe), had declined in seven (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Malawi, Niger, Uganda, and Zambia) and remained unchanged in seven (Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo, eSwatini, Namibia, Rwanda, Somalia, and South Africa). In Kenya, the ranges of both Giraffa tippelskirchi and Giraffa camelopardalis decreased, but the range of Giraffa reticulata was larger than previously believed. Our updated range maps increase existing knowledge, and are important for conservation planning for giraffe. However, since rapid infrastructure development throughout much of Africa is a driver of giraffe population declines, there is an urgent need for a continent-wide, consistent and systematic giraffe survey to produce more accurate range maps, in order to inform conservation and policy planning.
AB - Giraffe populations have declined in abundance by almost 40% over the last three decades, and the geographic ranges of the species (previously believed to be one, now defined as four species) have been significantly reduced or altered. With substantial changes in land uses, loss of habitat, declining abundance, translocations, and data gaps, the existing geographic range maps for giraffe need to be updated. We performed a review of existing giraffe range data, including aerial and ground observations of giraffe, existing geographic range maps, and available literature. The information we collected was discussed with and validated by subject-matter experts. Our updates may serve to correct inaccuracies or omissions in the baseline map, or may reflect actual changes in the distribution of giraffe. Relative to the 2016 International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List Assessment range map, the updated geographic range maps show a 5.6% decline in the range area of all giraffe taxa combined. The ranges of Giraffa camelopardalis (northern giraffe) and Giraffa tippelskirchi (Masai giraffe) decreased in area by 37% (122432 km2) and 4.7% (20816 km2) respectively, whereas 14% (41696 km2) of the range of Giraffa reticulata (reticulated giraffe) had not been included in the original geographic range map and has now been added. The range of Giraffa giraffa (southern giraffe) showed little overall change; it increased by 0.1% (419 km2). Ranges were larger than previously reported in six of the 21 range countries (Botswana, Ethiopia, Mozambique, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe), had declined in seven (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Malawi, Niger, Uganda, and Zambia) and remained unchanged in seven (Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo, eSwatini, Namibia, Rwanda, Somalia, and South Africa). In Kenya, the ranges of both Giraffa tippelskirchi and Giraffa camelopardalis decreased, but the range of Giraffa reticulata was larger than previously believed. Our updated range maps increase existing knowledge, and are important for conservation planning for giraffe. However, since rapid infrastructure development throughout much of Africa is a driver of giraffe population declines, there is an urgent need for a continent-wide, consistent and systematic giraffe survey to produce more accurate range maps, in order to inform conservation and policy planning.
KW - Africa
KW - aerial survey
KW - decline
KW - endangered
KW - geographic range
KW - giraffe
KW - spatial ecology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070759983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070759983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/mam.12165
DO - 10.1111/mam.12165
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85070759983
SN - 0305-1838
VL - 49
SP - 285
EP - 299
JO - Mammal Review
JF - Mammal Review
IS - 4
ER -