TY - CHAP
T1 - United States - Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products (WT/DS259; WT/DS252; WT/DS248; WT/DS249; WT/DS251; WT/DS258; WT/DS254; WT/DS253: DSR 2003: VII, 3117)
AU - Grossman, Gene M.
AU - Sykes, Alan O.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The American Law Institute 2006.
PY - 2006/1/1
Y1 - 2006/1/1
N2 - Introduction Since the inception of the WTO, safeguard measures have regularly been the subject of dispute settlement proceedings. The latest in this chain of disputes concerns the definitive safeguard measures imposed by the United States on a wide range of steel products in 2002. The safeguards investigation of steel imports was initiated under the US law by the US International Trade Commission (USITC) at the request of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) in June, 2001. The request covered four broad categories of steel products, which were divided into 33 categories by the USITC for purposes of data collection. Ultimately, the USITC defined 27 separate “industries” producing steel products within the scope of the investigation. For each of these industries, the USITC proceeded to determine whether imports had increased, and if so, whether increased imports were a substantial cause of serious injury or threat of injury. This analysis resulted in negative determinations for 15 industries, affirmative determinations for eight industries, and “divided” determinations (a 3-3 vote) for four industries. Under the US law, a negative determination by the USITC precludes any action by the President to impose a safeguard measure. Affirmative determinations and divided determinations are forwarded to the President for consideration of possible relief, along with remedial recommendations that the President is not bound to follow. As to some products, the USITC has recommended that imports from nations with which the United States has preferential trading arrangements - including Canada, Mexico, Israel, and Jordan - be exempted from any safeguard measures.
AB - Introduction Since the inception of the WTO, safeguard measures have regularly been the subject of dispute settlement proceedings. The latest in this chain of disputes concerns the definitive safeguard measures imposed by the United States on a wide range of steel products in 2002. The safeguards investigation of steel imports was initiated under the US law by the US International Trade Commission (USITC) at the request of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) in June, 2001. The request covered four broad categories of steel products, which were divided into 33 categories by the USITC for purposes of data collection. Ultimately, the USITC defined 27 separate “industries” producing steel products within the scope of the investigation. For each of these industries, the USITC proceeded to determine whether imports had increased, and if so, whether increased imports were a substantial cause of serious injury or threat of injury. This analysis resulted in negative determinations for 15 industries, affirmative determinations for eight industries, and “divided” determinations (a 3-3 vote) for four industries. Under the US law, a negative determination by the USITC precludes any action by the President to impose a safeguard measure. Affirmative determinations and divided determinations are forwarded to the President for consideration of possible relief, along with remedial recommendations that the President is not bound to follow. As to some products, the USITC has recommended that imports from nations with which the United States has preferential trading arrangements - including Canada, Mexico, Israel, and Jordan - be exempted from any safeguard measures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926950094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926950094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511754463.009
DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511754463.009
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84926950094
SN - 9780521834230
SP - 146
EP - 187
BT - The WTO Case Law of 2003
PB - Cambridge University Press
ER -