Abstract
Shaefer and Edin (2013) have found a large rise in “extreme poverty”-defined as cash income of no more than $2 per person per day, for a month or calendar quarter-among U.S. households with children between 1996 and 2011. This article explores some underlying dynamics of this phenomenon, referred to here as “$2-a-day poverty,” presenting evidence from both qualitative fieldwork and quantitative analysis of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). The rise in $2-a-day poverty has been concentrated among children experiencing it chronically-that is, for seven or more months during a calendar year. Both qualitative and quantitative evidence find that a large majority of children experiencing $2-a-day poverty live in households where an adult worked during the year, while only a small proportion live in households accessing TANF. Finally, households experiencing $2-a-day poverty appear to be more likely to face material hardships than other low-income households.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 120-138 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | RSF |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Keywords
- Low-wage work
- Material hardship
- Poverty
- Social policy
- Welfare