Two‐surface versus multi‐surface plasticity theories: A critical assessment

Jean H. Prevost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations


It is the objective of this note critically to assess the merits and shortcomings of two‐surface and multi‐surface plasticity theories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-338
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1982

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computational Mechanics
  • General Materials Science
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Mechanics of Materials


Dive into the research topics of 'Two‐surface versus multi‐surface plasticity theories: A critical assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this