Two‐surface versus multi‐surface plasticity theories: A critical assessment

Jean-Herve Prevost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is the objective of this note critically to assess the merits and shortcomings of two‐surface and multi‐surface plasticity theories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-338
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computational Mechanics
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Mechanics of Materials

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Two‐surface versus multi‐surface plasticity theories: A critical assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this