Twitter vs. printed English: An information-theoretic comparison

Emma Glennon; Lalitha Sankar; H. Vincent Poor

doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288563

Twitter vs. printed English: An information-theoretic comparison

Emma Glennon, Lalitha Sankar, H. Vincent Poor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

The popular social networking and microblogging service Twitter contains language that is very different from what is considered proper. This paper quantifies those linguistic differences between printed English and Tweetspeak using information-theoretic concepts. Letter-based n-gram entropies are calculated and compared to analagous data from two corpora of printed English to demonstrate that 1) Twitter's entropy is overall higher than that of printed English, and 2) individual users' entropies are on average higher the less conventional their language use is. The implications for digitally-mediated communication in general are also discussed.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012 - Proceedings
Pages	3069-3072
Number of pages	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288563
State	Published - Oct 23 2012
Event	2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012 - Kyoto, Japan Duration: Mar 25 2012 → Mar 30 2012

Other

Other	2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012
Country	Japan
City	Kyoto
Period	3/25/12 → 3/30/12

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Software
Signal Processing
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288563

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Twitter vs. printed English: An information-theoretic comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@inproceedings{cc34fcaef7604c118103668898da90a1,

title = "Twitter vs. printed English: An information-theoretic comparison",

abstract = "The popular social networking and microblogging service Twitter contains language that is very different from what is considered proper. This paper quantifies those linguistic differences between printed English and Tweetspeak using information-theoretic concepts. Letter-based n-gram entropies are calculated and compared to analagous data from two corpora of printed English to demonstrate that 1) Twitter's entropy is overall higher than that of printed English, and 2) individual users' entropies are on average higher the less conventional their language use is. The implications for digitally-mediated communication in general are also discussed.",

author = "Emma Glennon and Lalitha Sankar and Poor, {H. Vincent}",

year = "2012",

month = oct,

day = "23",

doi = "10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288563",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9781467300469",

pages = "3069--3072",

booktitle = "2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012 - Proceedings",

note = "2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012 ; Conference date: 25-03-2012 Through 30-03-2012",

}

Glennon, E, Sankar, L & Poor, HV 2012, Twitter vs. printed English: An information-theoretic comparison. in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012 - Proceedings., 6288563, pp. 3069-3072, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012, Kyoto, Japan, 3/25/12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288563

TY - GEN

T1 - Twitter vs. printed English

T2 - 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012

AU - Glennon, Emma

AU - Sankar, Lalitha

AU - Poor, H. Vincent

PY - 2012/10/23

Y1 - 2012/10/23

N2 - The popular social networking and microblogging service Twitter contains language that is very different from what is considered proper. This paper quantifies those linguistic differences between printed English and Tweetspeak using information-theoretic concepts. Letter-based n-gram entropies are calculated and compared to analagous data from two corpora of printed English to demonstrate that 1) Twitter's entropy is overall higher than that of printed English, and 2) individual users' entropies are on average higher the less conventional their language use is. The implications for digitally-mediated communication in general are also discussed.

AB - The popular social networking and microblogging service Twitter contains language that is very different from what is considered proper. This paper quantifies those linguistic differences between printed English and Tweetspeak using information-theoretic concepts. Letter-based n-gram entropies are calculated and compared to analagous data from two corpora of printed English to demonstrate that 1) Twitter's entropy is overall higher than that of printed English, and 2) individual users' entropies are on average higher the less conventional their language use is. The implications for digitally-mediated communication in general are also discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867596031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867596031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288563

DO - 10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288563

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84867596031

SN - 9781467300469

SP - 3069

EP - 3072

BT - 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012 - Proceedings

Y2 - 25 March 2012 through 30 March 2012

ER -

Twitter vs. printed English: An information-theoretic comparison

Abstract

Other

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this