Twenty-first-century projections of North Atlantic tropical storms from CMIP5 models

Gabriele Villarini, Gabriel A. Vecchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Scopus citations

Abstract

Assessing potential changes in North Atlantic (NA) tropical storm (TS) activity this century is of paramount societal and economic significance, and the topic of intense scientific research. We explore projections of NA TS changes over the twenty-first century by applying a statistical downscaling methodology to a suite of experiments with the latest state-of-the-art global coupled climate models. We also apply a methodology to partition the dominant sources of uncertainty in the TS projections. We find that over the first half of the twenty-first century radiative forcing changes act to increase NA TS frequency; this increase arises from radiative forcings other than increasing CO 2 (probably aerosols). However, NA TS trends over the entire twenty-first century are of ambiguous sign. We find that for NA TS frequency, in contrast to sea surface temperature (SST), the largest uncertainties are driven by the chaotic nature of the climate system and by the climate response to radiative forcing. These results highlight the need to better understand the processes controlling patterns of SST change in response to radiative forcing and internal climate variability to constrain estimates of future NA TS activity. Coordinated experiments isolating forcing agents in projections should improve our understanding, and would enable better assessment of future TS activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)604-607
Number of pages4
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume2
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Twenty-first-century projections of North Atlantic tropical storms from CMIP5 models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this