Abstract
This paper addresses three claims that are often made among contemporary policy-makers, political scientists and political theorists about democracy. The claims, in my view, are false and indeed revealingly false: they display a serious misunderstanding of the nature and appeal of democracy. As we see why they are false, we will come to appreciate dimensions of democracy that easily escape notice. I name the mistakes after outstanding thinkers who have made them. The first I describe as Berlin’s mistake, finding it in the work of the Anglo-Russian philosopher, Isaiah Berlin. The second I describe as Schumpeter’s mistake, naming it after the Austrian-American banker, economist and political thinker, Joseph Schumpeter. And the third I describe as Riker’s mistake, associating it with William Riker, the American political scientist, famous for his distinction between liberalism and populism.
| Translated title of the contribution | THREE MISTAKES ABOUT DEMOCRACY |
|---|---|
| Original language | Polish |
| Pages (from-to) | 111-124 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Roczniki Filozoficzne |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Isaiah Berlin
- Joseph Schumpeter
- William Riker
- democracy
- republicanism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'THREE MISTAKES ABOUT DEMOCRACY'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver