Abstract
In recent years, psychological researchers have been heavily criticized for generalizing broadly from narrow samples, a concern that intersects with questions about the validity, reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of the psychological literature. One issue is the limited reporting of participants’ identities, backgrounds, and lived experiences. To address this issue, several journals have begun to require greater reporting of participants’ sociodemographic information. In this article, we address both challenges and considerations with respect to sociodemographic reporting for researchers, reviewers, and journal editors. We provide guidance for recording, evaluating, protecting, and interpreting sociodemographic data.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 354-373 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Cognition and Development |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tools of the Trade: A Guide to Sociodemographic Reporting for Researchers, Reviewers, and Editors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver