To network or not to network: Art, the literary, and “invention” in early modern European radical religion

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article contrasts hostility toward visual and literary art in English radical Puritanism before the late seventeenth century with the central role of art for Dutch Mennonites, many involved in the commercial prosperity of Amsterdam. Both 1620s Mennonites and 1650s-1660s Quakers debated the relationship between literal truth of the Bible and claims for the power of a personally felt Holy Spirit. This was the intra-Mennonite “Two-Word Dispute,” and for Quakers an opportunity to attack Puritans who argued that the Bible was literally the Word of God, not the “light within.” Mennonites like Jan Theunisz and Quakers like Samuel Fisher made extensive use of learning, festive subversion and poetry. Texts from the earlier dispute were republished in order to traduce the Quakers when they came to Amsterdam in the 1650s and discovered openness to conversation but not conversion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-398
Number of pages23
JournalChurch History and Religious Culture
Volume101
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Religious studies

Keywords

  • Art
  • Bible
  • Conversion
  • Holy Spirit
  • Humor
  • Invention
  • Mennonites
  • Poetry
  • Quakers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To network or not to network: Art, the literary, and “invention” in early modern European radical religion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this