Theory, external validity, and experimental inference: Some conjectures

Fernando Martel Garcia, Leonard Wantchekon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is often argued that experiments are strong on causal identification (internal validity) but weak on generalizability (external validity). One widely accepted way to limit threats to external validity is to incorporate as much variation in the background conditions and in the covariates as possible through replication. Another strategy is to make the theoretical foundations of the experiment more explicit. The latter requires that we develop trajectories of experiments that are consistent with a theoretical argument. In other words, new experiments should not simply consist of changing the context of old ones, but do so in ways that explicitly test various aspects of a theory in a coherent way.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-147
Number of pages16
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume628
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Social Sciences

Keywords

  • Causal inference
  • External validity
  • Randomized experiments

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Theory, external validity, and experimental inference: Some conjectures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this