TY - JOUR
T1 - The structural determinants of urban poverty
T2 - A comparison of whites, blacks, and Hispanics
AU - Eggers, Mitchell L.
AU - Massey, Douglas S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper was prepared with support from NICHD Grant HD22992, which is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank Robert Moffitt for making his welfare data available to us.
PY - 1991/9
Y1 - 1991/9
N2 - This paper analyzes similarities and differences in structural forces generating urban poverty among whites, blacks, and Hispanics. We specify an integrated structural equation model based on current theories about the causes of urban poverty proposed by Murray (1984) and Wilson (1987). This model is estimated for each group using data on 59 U.S. standard metropolitan statistical areas (SMSAs) in 1980. Neither theory provides a good explanation for patterns of white poverty, which are determined more by prevailing wage rates and levels of white education. Both theories, however, are verified when applied to the two minority groups; but neither theory identifies the single factor which most strongly determines minority poverty: prevailing wage rates. In general, Murray's hypothesis proves to be more powerful than Wilson's in accounting for urban poverty among blacks, whereas Wilson's theory provides a more powerful explanation in the case of Hispanics. Wilson's structural economic effects, however, are mediated less through the minority marriage market than through their direct effect on the income distribution.
AB - This paper analyzes similarities and differences in structural forces generating urban poverty among whites, blacks, and Hispanics. We specify an integrated structural equation model based on current theories about the causes of urban poverty proposed by Murray (1984) and Wilson (1987). This model is estimated for each group using data on 59 U.S. standard metropolitan statistical areas (SMSAs) in 1980. Neither theory provides a good explanation for patterns of white poverty, which are determined more by prevailing wage rates and levels of white education. Both theories, however, are verified when applied to the two minority groups; but neither theory identifies the single factor which most strongly determines minority poverty: prevailing wage rates. In general, Murray's hypothesis proves to be more powerful than Wilson's in accounting for urban poverty among blacks, whereas Wilson's theory provides a more powerful explanation in the case of Hispanics. Wilson's structural economic effects, however, are mediated less through the minority marriage market than through their direct effect on the income distribution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000609339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000609339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0049-089X(91)90006-O
DO - 10.1016/0049-089X(91)90006-O
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000609339
SN - 0049-089X
VL - 20
SP - 217
EP - 255
JO - Social Science Research
JF - Social Science Research
IS - 3
ER -