TY - JOUR
T1 - The Simons Observatory
T2 - Beam Characterization for the Small Aperture Telescopes
AU - Dachlythra, Nadia
AU - Duivenvoorden, Adriaan J.
AU - Gudmundsson, Jon E.
AU - Hasselfield, Matthew
AU - Coppi, Gabriele
AU - Adler, Alexandre E.
AU - Alonso, David
AU - Azzoni, Susanna
AU - Chesmore, Grace E.
AU - Fabbian, Giulio
AU - Ganga, Ken
AU - Gerras, Remington G.
AU - Jaffe, Andrew H.
AU - Johnson, Bradley R.
AU - Keating, Brian
AU - Keskitalo, Reijo
AU - Kisner, Theodore S.
AU - Krachmalnicoff, Nicoletta
AU - Lungu, Marius
AU - Matsuda, Frederick
AU - Naess, Sigurd
AU - Page, Lyman
AU - Puddu, Roberto
AU - Puglisi, Giuseppe
AU - Simon, Sara M.
AU - Teply, Grant
AU - Tsan, Tran
AU - Wollack, Edward J.
AU - Wolz, Kevin
AU - Xu, Zhilei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - We use time-domain simulations of Jupiter observations to test and develop a beam reconstruction pipeline for the Simons Observatory Small Aperture Telescopes. The method relies on a mapmaker that estimates and subtracts correlated atmospheric noise and a beam fitting code designed to compensate for the bias caused by the mapmaker. We test our reconstruction performance for four different frequency bands against various algorithmic parameters, atmospheric conditions, and input beams. We additionally show the reconstruction quality as a function of the number of available observations and investigate how different calibration strategies affect the beam uncertainty. For all of the cases considered, we find good agreement between the fitted results and the input beam model within an ∼1.5% error for a multipole range ℓ = 30-700 and an ∼0.5% error for a multipole range ℓ = 50-200.
AB - We use time-domain simulations of Jupiter observations to test and develop a beam reconstruction pipeline for the Simons Observatory Small Aperture Telescopes. The method relies on a mapmaker that estimates and subtracts correlated atmospheric noise and a beam fitting code designed to compensate for the bias caused by the mapmaker. We test our reconstruction performance for four different frequency bands against various algorithmic parameters, atmospheric conditions, and input beams. We additionally show the reconstruction quality as a function of the number of available observations and investigate how different calibration strategies affect the beam uncertainty. For all of the cases considered, we find good agreement between the fitted results and the input beam model within an ∼1.5% error for a multipole range ℓ = 30-700 and an ∼0.5% error for a multipole range ℓ = 50-200.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183667415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85183667415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0969
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0969
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183667415
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 961
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 138
ER -