The role of syntax in the nuclear stress rule

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

How directly the operation of phrasal stress placement refers to syntax is theory-dependent: directly in some (e.g., Truckenbrodt 1995, Kahnemuyipour 2009), indirectly in others (e.g., Chomsky & Halle 1968, Halle & Vergnaud 1987). Adequately evaluating this issue requires knowing both the relevant syntactic structure(s) as well as how syntax interacts with phonology – neither is trivial. This paper argues that syntax transparently feeds prosody at regular sub-intervals of structure building (e.g., Uriagereka 1999, Chomsky 2001), and the phrasal stress placement operation refers directly to syntactic hierarchy, without exception. As such, wherever the NSR’s predictions are “incorrect”, the syntactic representation must be amended (e.g., Steedman 2000, Wagner 2005). The major contribution of this work is not in its specific findings, but rather in its demonstration of a methodology by which phrasal stress data are used to understand syntax and not vice versa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-206
Number of pages4
JournalProceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody
Volume2016-January
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes
Event8th Speech Prosody 2016 - Boston, United States
Duration: May 31 2016Jun 3 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Keywords

  • Nuclear Stress Rule
  • Phrasal Stress
  • Putative Exceptions
  • The Syntax- Prosody Interface

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of syntax in the nuclear stress rule'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this