The Quest for Japanese Fascism: A Historiographical Overview

Federico Marcon

doi:10.30687/978-88-6969-527-8/004

The Quest for Japanese Fascism: A Historiographical Overview

Federico Marcon

East Asian Studies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

‘Japanese fascism’ is a historiographical construct rather than a historical reality. Whether Japan’s sociopolitical developments in the 1930s and early 1940s can be legitimately and authoritatively defined as ‘fascist’ depends on the triangulation of three axes of analysis: historical reconstructions of institutional, political, social, and ideological processes; historiographical surveys of the palimpsest of interpretations historians have given to this period of Japanese history; and metahistorical analyses of the cognitive legitimacy of the category of ‘fascism’. This essay focuses on the second axis, offering a historical survey of the historiographical debate on ‘Japanese fascism’ worldwide.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Ca' Foscari Japanese Studies
Subtitle of host publication	Religion and Thought
Publisher	Edizioni Ca Foscari
Pages	53-86
Number of pages	34
Edition	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-527-8/004
State	Published - 2021

Publication series

Name	Ca' Foscari Japanese Studies: Religion and Thought
Number	4
Volume	14
ISSN (Print)	2610-900X
ISSN (Electronic)	2610-9417

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Religious studies
Philosophy
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Keywords

Fascism
Historiography
Japanese Fascism
Japanese Imperialism
Second World War

Access to Document

10.30687/978-88-6969-527-8/004

Cite this

@inbook{a08eb240a5c54761bf0eda9a444579cb,

title = "The Quest for Japanese Fascism: A Historiographical Overview",

abstract = "{\textquoteleft}Japanese fascism{\textquoteright} is a historiographical construct rather than a historical reality. Whether Japan{\textquoteright}s sociopolitical developments in the 1930s and early 1940s can be legitimately and authoritatively defined as {\textquoteleft}fascist{\textquoteright} depends on the triangulation of three axes of analysis: historical reconstructions of institutional, political, social, and ideological processes; historiographical surveys of the palimpsest of interpretations historians have given to this period of Japanese history; and metahistorical analyses of the cognitive legitimacy of the category of {\textquoteleft}fascism{\textquoteright}. This essay focuses on the second axis, offering a historical survey of the historiographical debate on {\textquoteleft}Japanese fascism{\textquoteright} worldwide.",

keywords = "Fascism, Historiography, Japanese Fascism, Japanese Imperialism, Second World War",

author = "Federico Marcon",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.30687/978-88-6969-527-8/004",

language = "English (US)",

series = "Ca' Foscari Japanese Studies: Religion and Thought",

publisher = "Edizioni Ca Foscari",

number = "4",

pages = "53--86",

booktitle = "Ca' Foscari Japanese Studies",

address = "Italy",

edition = "4",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Quest for Japanese Fascism

T2 - A Historiographical Overview

AU - Marcon, Federico

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - ‘Japanese fascism’ is a historiographical construct rather than a historical reality. Whether Japan’s sociopolitical developments in the 1930s and early 1940s can be legitimately and authoritatively defined as ‘fascist’ depends on the triangulation of three axes of analysis: historical reconstructions of institutional, political, social, and ideological processes; historiographical surveys of the palimpsest of interpretations historians have given to this period of Japanese history; and metahistorical analyses of the cognitive legitimacy of the category of ‘fascism’. This essay focuses on the second axis, offering a historical survey of the historiographical debate on ‘Japanese fascism’ worldwide.

AB - ‘Japanese fascism’ is a historiographical construct rather than a historical reality. Whether Japan’s sociopolitical developments in the 1930s and early 1940s can be legitimately and authoritatively defined as ‘fascist’ depends on the triangulation of three axes of analysis: historical reconstructions of institutional, political, social, and ideological processes; historiographical surveys of the palimpsest of interpretations historians have given to this period of Japanese history; and metahistorical analyses of the cognitive legitimacy of the category of ‘fascism’. This essay focuses on the second axis, offering a historical survey of the historiographical debate on ‘Japanese fascism’ worldwide.

KW - Fascism

KW - Historiography

KW - Japanese Fascism

KW - Japanese Imperialism

KW - Second World War

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195790281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85195790281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.30687/978-88-6969-527-8/004

DO - 10.30687/978-88-6969-527-8/004

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85195790281

T3 - Ca' Foscari Japanese Studies: Religion and Thought

SP - 53

EP - 86

BT - Ca' Foscari Japanese Studies

PB - Edizioni Ca Foscari

ER -

The Quest for Japanese Fascism: A Historiographical Overview

Abstract

Publication series

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this