Abstract
Incertitude in the orientation factor, κ2, in Förster-type resonance energy transfer (FRET) has thus far hindered the evaluation of donor-acceptor distances in single-molecule measurements. In part, the confusion arises from directly applying ideas developed for ensemble-averaged experiments. By carefully considering the fundamental difference between single-molecule and bulk measurements, it is shown that, regardless of the excited-state lifetime of the chromophores, the idealized value of 2/3 is a very good approximation (within 10% relative error) for a broad range of parameter space for single-molecule FRET applications. Implications for interpreting and designing single-molecule FRET experiments are also discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-321 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Israel Journal of Chemistry |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2009 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Chemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The orientation factor in single-molecule förster-type resonance energy transfer, with examples for conformational transitions in proteins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver