TY - JOUR
T1 - The optimization landscape of hybrid quantum–classical algorithms
T2 - From quantum control to NISQ applications
AU - Ge, Xiaozhen
AU - Wu, Re Bing
AU - Rabitz, Herschel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - This review investigates the landscapes of hybrid quantum–classical optimization algorithms that are prevalent in many rapidly developing quantum technologies, where the objective function is computed by either a natural quantum system or an engineered quantum ansatz, but the optimizer is classical. In any particular case, the nature of the underlying control landscape is fundamentally important for systematic optimization of the objective. In early studies on the optimal control of few-body dynamics, the optimizer could take full control of the relatively low-dimensional quantum systems to be manipulated. Stepping into the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, the experimentally growing computational power of the ansatz expressed as quantum hardware may bring quantum advantage over classical computers, but the classical optimizer is often limited by the available control resources. Across these different scales, we will show that the landscape's geometry experiences morphological changes from favorable trap-free landscapes to easily trapping rugged landscapes, and eventually to barren-plateau landscapes on which the optimizer can hardly move. This unified view provides the basis for understanding classes of systems that may be readily controlled out to those with special consideration, including the difficulties and potential advantages of NISQ technologies, as well as seeking possible ways to escape traps or plateaus, in particular circumstances.
AB - This review investigates the landscapes of hybrid quantum–classical optimization algorithms that are prevalent in many rapidly developing quantum technologies, where the objective function is computed by either a natural quantum system or an engineered quantum ansatz, but the optimizer is classical. In any particular case, the nature of the underlying control landscape is fundamentally important for systematic optimization of the objective. In early studies on the optimal control of few-body dynamics, the optimizer could take full control of the relatively low-dimensional quantum systems to be manipulated. Stepping into the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, the experimentally growing computational power of the ansatz expressed as quantum hardware may bring quantum advantage over classical computers, but the classical optimizer is often limited by the available control resources. Across these different scales, we will show that the landscape's geometry experiences morphological changes from favorable trap-free landscapes to easily trapping rugged landscapes, and eventually to barren-plateau landscapes on which the optimizer can hardly move. This unified view provides the basis for understanding classes of systems that may be readily controlled out to those with special consideration, including the difficulties and potential advantages of NISQ technologies, as well as seeking possible ways to escape traps or plateaus, in particular circumstances.
KW - Optimization landscape
KW - Quantum control
KW - Variational quantum algorithm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133808987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133808987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.06.001
DO - 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.06.001
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85133808987
SN - 1367-5788
VL - 54
SP - 314
EP - 323
JO - Annual Reviews in Control
JF - Annual Reviews in Control
ER -