TY - JOUR
T1 - The North American Greenhouse Gas Budget
T2 - Emissions, Removals, and Integration for CO2, CH4, and N2O (2010–2019): Results From the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Study (RECCAP2)
AU - Poulter, Benjamin
AU - Murray-Tortarolo, Guillermo
AU - Hayes, Daniel J.
AU - Ciais, Philippe
AU - Andrew, Robbie M.
AU - Bastos, Ana
AU - Byrne, Brendan
AU - Butman, David
AU - Canadell, Josep G.
AU - Chatterjee, Abhishek
AU - Domke, Grant
AU - Feldman, Andrew
AU - Foster, Kelsey
AU - Hunka, Neha
AU - Jackson, Robert B.
AU - Kurz, Werner A.
AU - Lindquist, Ayia
AU - Liu, Maodian
AU - Luijkx, Ingrid
AU - Mialon, Arnaud
AU - Michalak, Anna M.
AU - Miller, John
AU - Obermeier, Wolfgang A.
AU - Pan, Naiqin
AU - Randerson, James T.
AU - Raymond, Peter A.
AU - Regnier, Pierre
AU - Resplandy, Laure
AU - Rocher-Ros, Gerard
AU - Rodriquez-Fernandez, Nemesio
AU - Rosentreter, Judith
AU - Salazar-Neira, Julio César
AU - Tank, Suzanne E.
AU - Tian, Hanqin
AU - Vargas, Rodrigo
AU - Villalobos, Yohanna
AU - Wang, Jonathan A.
AU - Wei, Xinyuan
AU - Wickland, Kimberly P.
AU - Williams, Christopher
AU - Windham-Myers, Lisamarie
AU - Woodall, Christopher
AU - Ying, Qing
AU - Zhang, Zhen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Accurate accounting of greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions and removals is central to tracking progress toward climate mitigation and for monitoring potential climate-change feedbacks. GHG budgeting and reporting can follow either the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodologies for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (NGHGI) reporting or use atmospheric-based “top-down” (TD) inversions or process-based “bottom-up” (BU) approaches. To help understand and reconcile these approaches, the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes study (RECCAP2) was established to quantify GHG emissions and removals for carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), for ten-land and five-ocean regions for 2010–2019. Here, we present the results for the North American land region (Canada, the United States, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean). For 2010–2019, the NGHGI reported total net-GHG emissions of 7,270 TgCO2-eq yr−1 compared to TD estimates of 6,132 ± 1,846 TgCO2-eq yr−1 and BU estimates of 9,060 ± 898 TgCO2-eq yr−1. Reconciling differences between the NGHGI, TD and BU approaches depended on (a) accounting for lateral fluxes of CO2 along the land-ocean-aquatic continuum (LOAC) and trade, (b) correcting land-use CO2 emissions for the loss-of-additional-sink capacity (LASC), (c) avoiding double counting of inland water CH4 emissions, and (d) adjusting area estimates to match the NGHGI definition of the managed-land proxy. Uncertainties remain from inland-water CO2 evasion, the conversion of nitrogen fertilizers to N2O, and from less-frequent NGHGI reporting from non-Annex-1 countries. The RECCAP2 framework plays a key role in reconciling independent GHG-reporting methodologies to support policy commitments while providing insights into biogeochemical processes and responses to climate change.
AB - Accurate accounting of greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions and removals is central to tracking progress toward climate mitigation and for monitoring potential climate-change feedbacks. GHG budgeting and reporting can follow either the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodologies for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (NGHGI) reporting or use atmospheric-based “top-down” (TD) inversions or process-based “bottom-up” (BU) approaches. To help understand and reconcile these approaches, the Second REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes study (RECCAP2) was established to quantify GHG emissions and removals for carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), for ten-land and five-ocean regions for 2010–2019. Here, we present the results for the North American land region (Canada, the United States, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean). For 2010–2019, the NGHGI reported total net-GHG emissions of 7,270 TgCO2-eq yr−1 compared to TD estimates of 6,132 ± 1,846 TgCO2-eq yr−1 and BU estimates of 9,060 ± 898 TgCO2-eq yr−1. Reconciling differences between the NGHGI, TD and BU approaches depended on (a) accounting for lateral fluxes of CO2 along the land-ocean-aquatic continuum (LOAC) and trade, (b) correcting land-use CO2 emissions for the loss-of-additional-sink capacity (LASC), (c) avoiding double counting of inland water CH4 emissions, and (d) adjusting area estimates to match the NGHGI definition of the managed-land proxy. Uncertainties remain from inland-water CO2 evasion, the conversion of nitrogen fertilizers to N2O, and from less-frequent NGHGI reporting from non-Annex-1 countries. The RECCAP2 framework plays a key role in reconciling independent GHG-reporting methodologies to support policy commitments while providing insights into biogeochemical processes and responses to climate change.
KW - agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU)
KW - bottom-up
KW - carbon dioxide
KW - land ocean aquatic continuum (LOAC)
KW - lateral fluxes
KW - methane
KW - nitrous oxide
KW - top-down
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002083122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105002083122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2024GB008310
DO - 10.1029/2024GB008310
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002083122
SN - 0886-6236
VL - 39
JO - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
JF - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
IS - 4
M1 - e2024GB008310
ER -