Abstract
This paper examines why so much debate about the structure of the international economy revolves around a conference held at Bretton Woods in July 1944 which was not immediately conspicuously successful. There was a unique confluence of contemporary contexts-in terms of trade policy, stabilization policy, and policies with regard to capital movements-that meant that prevailing ideas (especially the ideas of John Maynard Keynes) and the interests of the United States coincided. It was fundamentally a victory of the United States, but dressed up as benign multilateralism. A similarly unique combination of circumstances surrounded European efforts in the 1970s and was later to create, through the European Monetary System, a scaled-down version of Bretton Woods. The myth of Bretton Woods was created by a powerful retrospective interpretation or retrospective context that lent a golden halo to the whole exercise. In that sense our interpretation of a very specific historical event is inseparably intertwined with views of what happened after as well as before that event.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 411-430 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Oxford Review of Economic Policy |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2013 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics and Econometrics
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Keywords
- Bretton Woods
- Capital movements
- European Monetary System
- Imbalances
- Inconsistent trinity
- International cooperation
- International economic order