Abstract
The chapter takes as its starting point the central claim in Arthur Ripstein’s defense of a Kantian approach to war, namely that each state has a right to be independent from the determining choice of other states. The state’s right to independence is the basis for its permission to use force in national defense, and also for in bello restrictions that limit the permissible means of waging war to those necessary to stop aggression. But what morally justifies the state’s right to independence? And can this right be accounted for on Kantian grounds? Specifically, Stilz focuses on whether the Kantian view, as Ripstein reconstructs it, provides a philosophically satisfying basis for attributing a right to political independence to the state. In the final section, she outlines an alternative reading of Kant that may provide a more compelling moral foundation for this right.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Public Uses of Coercion and Force |
Subtitle of host publication | From Constitutionalism to War |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 52-63 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780197519103 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
Keywords
- Colonialism
- Force
- Independence
- Kant
- Self-determination
- Sovereignty
- Territory