Abstract
After providing a brief overview of Marcus Willaschek's Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics, I critically reconstruct his account of 'transcendental realism' and the role that it plays in the dramatic narrative of the Critique of Pure Reason. I then lay out in detail how Willaschek generates and evaluates various versions of transcendental realism and raise some concerns about each. Next, I look at precisely how Willaschek's Kant thinks we can avoid applying the 'supreme' dialectical principle (for every conditioned there is a totality of conditions which is unconditioned) to the domain of appearances. Finally, I call into question Willaschek's efforts to appropriate the lessons of the Transcendental Dialectic without following Kant into transcendental idealism.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-293 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Kantian Review |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Critique of Pure Reason
- Kant
- Transcendental Dialectic
- critique
- metaphysics
- transcendental idealism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Many Faces of Transcendental Realism: Willaschek on Kant's Dialectic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver