Abstract
After providing a brief overview of Marcus Willaschek's Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics, I critically reconstruct his account of 'transcendental realism' and the role that it plays in the dramatic narrative of the Critique of Pure Reason. I then lay out in detail how Willaschek generates and evaluates various versions of transcendental realism and raise some concerns about each. Next, I look at precisely how Willaschek's Kant thinks we can avoid applying the 'supreme' dialectical principle (for every conditioned there is a totality of conditions which is unconditioned) to the domain of appearances. Finally, I call into question Willaschek's efforts to appropriate the lessons of the Transcendental Dialectic without following Kant into transcendental idealism.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 279-293 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Kantian Review |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Critique of Pure Reason
- Kant
- Transcendental Dialectic
- critique
- metaphysics
- transcendental idealism