TY - JOUR
T1 - The Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission on antimicrobial resistance
T2 - 6 years later
AU - Laxminarayan, Ramanan
AU - Van Boeckel, Thomas
AU - Frost, Isabel
AU - Kariuki, Samuel
AU - Khan, Ejaz Ahmed
AU - Limmathurotsakul, Direk
AU - Larsson, D. G.Joakim
AU - Levy-Hara, Gabriel
AU - Mendelson, Marc
AU - Outterson, Kevin
AU - Peacock, Sharon J.
AU - Zhu, Yong Guan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - In 2013, a Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission described the state of antimicrobial resistance worldwide. Since then, greater awareness of the public health ramifications of antimicrobial resistance has led to national actions and global initiatives, including a resolution at the high-level meeting of the UN General Assembly in 2016. Progress in addressing this issue has ranged from a ban on irrational drug combinations in India to commitments to ban colistin as a growth promoter in animals, improve hospital infection control, and implement better antimicrobial stewardship. Funds have been mobilised, and regulatory barriers to new antibiotic development have been relaxed. These efforts have been episodic and uneven across countries, however. Sustained funding for antimicrobial resistance and globally harmonised targets to monitor progress are still urgently needed. Except for in a few leading countries, antimicrobial resistance has not captured the sustained focus of national leaders and country-level actors, including care providers.
AB - In 2013, a Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission described the state of antimicrobial resistance worldwide. Since then, greater awareness of the public health ramifications of antimicrobial resistance has led to national actions and global initiatives, including a resolution at the high-level meeting of the UN General Assembly in 2016. Progress in addressing this issue has ranged from a ban on irrational drug combinations in India to commitments to ban colistin as a growth promoter in animals, improve hospital infection control, and implement better antimicrobial stewardship. Funds have been mobilised, and regulatory barriers to new antibiotic development have been relaxed. These efforts have been episodic and uneven across countries, however. Sustained funding for antimicrobial resistance and globally harmonised targets to monitor progress are still urgently needed. Except for in a few leading countries, antimicrobial resistance has not captured the sustained focus of national leaders and country-level actors, including care providers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082182997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082182997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30003-7
DO - 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30003-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32059790
AN - SCOPUS:85082182997
SN - 1473-3099
VL - 20
SP - e51-e60
JO - The Lancet Infectious Diseases
JF - The Lancet Infectious Diseases
IS - 4
ER -