The Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission on antimicrobial resistance: 6 years later

Ramanan Laxminarayan, Thomas Van Boeckel, Isabel Frost, Samuel Kariuki, Ejaz Ahmed Khan, Direk Limmathurotsakul, D. G.Joakim Larsson, Gabriel Levy-Hara, Marc Mendelson, Kevin Outterson, Sharon J. Peacock, Yong Guan Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

182 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2013, a Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission described the state of antimicrobial resistance worldwide. Since then, greater awareness of the public health ramifications of antimicrobial resistance has led to national actions and global initiatives, including a resolution at the high-level meeting of the UN General Assembly in 2016. Progress in addressing this issue has ranged from a ban on irrational drug combinations in India to commitments to ban colistin as a growth promoter in animals, improve hospital infection control, and implement better antimicrobial stewardship. Funds have been mobilised, and regulatory barriers to new antibiotic development have been relaxed. These efforts have been episodic and uneven across countries, however. Sustained funding for antimicrobial resistance and globally harmonised targets to monitor progress are still urgently needed. Except for in a few leading countries, antimicrobial resistance has not captured the sustained focus of national leaders and country-level actors, including care providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e51-e60
JournalThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission on antimicrobial resistance: 6 years later'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this