The incoherence argument: Reply to Schafer-Landau

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

@article{ee482d15c6ee48638e903df47744a376,

title = "The incoherence argument: Reply to Schafer-Landau",

author = "Michael Smith",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1111/1467-8284.00303",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "61",

pages = "254--266",

journal = "Analysis",

issn = "0003-2638",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "271",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The incoherence argument

T2 - Reply to Schafer-Landau

AU - Smith, Michael

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43149120111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43149120111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8284.00303

DO - 10.1111/1467-8284.00303

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:43149120111

SN - 0003-2638

VL - 61

SP - 254

EP - 266

JO - Analysis

JF - Analysis

IS - 271

ER -