The impossibility of a paretian loyalist

Peter Gärdenfors, Philip Pettit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Amartya Sen has argued the impossibility of the Paretian liberal. While his abstract argument is compelling, the concrete significance of the conclusion is in some doubt. This is because it is not clear how important liberalism in his sense is; in particular it is not clear that the sort of liberalism required for the impossibility result is a compelling variety. We show that even if the argument cannot be used to establish the inconsistency of Paretianism and common-or-garden liberalism, it can be adapted to prove a parallel impossibility. This is the impossibility of combining the Pareto criterion with a loyalty constraint involving certain claim-rights rather than liberty-rights. The impossibility of the Paretian loyalist is of interest in itself but it is also interesting for the light it throws on the source of Sen-style impossibilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-216
Number of pages10
JournalTheory and Decision
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1989
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Decision Sciences
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology
  • General Social Sciences
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Computer Science Applications

Keywords

  • Liberal paradox
  • Pareto-criterion
  • liberalism
  • prisoner's dilemma
  • rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impossibility of a paretian loyalist'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this