TY - JOUR
T1 - The importance of competition and facilitation for global tree diversity
AU - Xu, Han
AU - Detto, Matteo
AU - Hogan, J. Aaron
AU - Alonso, Alfonso
AU - Birch, Joseph D.
AU - Bissiengou, Pulchérie
AU - Chu, Chengjin
AU - Davies, Stuart J.
AU - Fischer, Gunter A.
AU - Hau, Billy C.H.
AU - Kenfack, David
AU - Li, Buhang
AU - Lian, Juyu
AU - Lin, Mingxian
AU - Liu, Wande
AU - Liu, Yu
AU - Liu, Zhifa
AU - Lutz, James A.
AU - Memiaghe, Hervé Roland
AU - Mi, Xiangcheng
AU - Novotny, Vojtech
AU - Ren, Haibao
AU - Su, Jianrong
AU - Thompson, Jill
AU - Uriarte, Maria
AU - Valencia, Renato
AU - Yao, Tze Leong
AU - Yap, Sandra L.
AU - Zhang, Yicen
AU - Zimmerman, Jess K.
AU - Weiblen, George D.
AU - Li, Yide
AU - Fang, Suqin
AU - He, Fangliang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2026.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Although competition and facilitation both influence tree diversity1, 2, 3, 4–5, their relative importance and variation with latitude remain poorly understood. Using data from 17 large forest plots, including around 2.7 million trees and over 5,400 species spanning 5° S to 47° N, we quantified the latitudinal trends of the relative importance of negative (competitive) and positive (facilitative) interactions among neighbouring tree species, accounting for three biotic and eight environmental factors. We examined whether the average neighbourhood species diversity around individuals of each focal species was larger or smaller than expected under null models. The results show that negative interspecific interactions prevailed across most plots. Near the equator, the relative proportions of species surrounded by a lower or higher than expected number of neighbours were roughly equal, but at higher latitudes, the proportions of species with a relatively higher number of neighbours declined, and those with fewer neighbours increased significantly. This latitudinal pattern can be attributed in part to reduced abundance of legumes, non-arbuscular mycorrhizal associations, and the weaker canopy nursing effect towards higher latitudes, but it was mediated by mean annual temperature. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized relative decline in facilitative interactions and increase in competitive interactions with latitude and suggest that rising temperatures could enhance facilitative effects and promote tree community diversity at higher latitudes.
AB - Although competition and facilitation both influence tree diversity1, 2, 3, 4–5, their relative importance and variation with latitude remain poorly understood. Using data from 17 large forest plots, including around 2.7 million trees and over 5,400 species spanning 5° S to 47° N, we quantified the latitudinal trends of the relative importance of negative (competitive) and positive (facilitative) interactions among neighbouring tree species, accounting for three biotic and eight environmental factors. We examined whether the average neighbourhood species diversity around individuals of each focal species was larger or smaller than expected under null models. The results show that negative interspecific interactions prevailed across most plots. Near the equator, the relative proportions of species surrounded by a lower or higher than expected number of neighbours were roughly equal, but at higher latitudes, the proportions of species with a relatively higher number of neighbours declined, and those with fewer neighbours increased significantly. This latitudinal pattern can be attributed in part to reduced abundance of legumes, non-arbuscular mycorrhizal associations, and the weaker canopy nursing effect towards higher latitudes, but it was mediated by mean annual temperature. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized relative decline in facilitative interactions and increase in competitive interactions with latitude and suggest that rising temperatures could enhance facilitative effects and promote tree community diversity at higher latitudes.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035887988
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035887988#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1038/s41586-026-10349-2
DO - 10.1038/s41586-026-10349-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 41951738
AN - SCOPUS:105035887988
SN - 0028-0836
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
ER -