TY - JOUR
T1 - The importance of agricultural lands for Himalayan birds in winter
AU - Elsen, Paul R.
AU - Kalyanaraman, Ramnarayan
AU - Ramesh, Krishnamurthy
AU - Wilcove, David S.
N1 - Funding Information:
P.R.E. was supported by the High Meadows Foundation, Princeton University, and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant DGE-1148900. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Fieldwork in GHNP was permitted by the Himachal Pradesh Forestry Department under permit 534. We thank L. Chand, H. Negi, P. Negi, B. Thakur, and D. Thakur for field assistance. We are grateful to A. Sood and P. Sood for additional field support. We thank T. M. Lee, S. J. Socolar, the handling editor, and 2 anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - The impacts of land-use change on biodiversity in the Himalayas are poorly known, notwithstanding widespread deforestation and agricultural intensification in this highly biodiverse region. Although intact primary forests harbor many Himalayan birds during breeding, a large number of bird species use agricultural lands during winter. We assessed how Himalayan bird species richness, abundance, and composition during winter are affected by forest loss stemming from agriculture and grazing. Bird surveys along 12 elevational transects within primary forest, low-intensity agriculture, mixed subsistence agriculture, and intensively grazed pastures in winter revealed that bird species richness and abundance were greatest in low-intensity and mixed agriculture, intermediate in grazed pastures, and lowest in primary forest at both local and landscape scales; over twice as many species and individuals were recorded in low-intensity agriculture than in primary forest. Bird communities in primary forests were distinct from those in all other land-use classes, but only 4 species were unique to primary forests. Low-, medium-, and high-intensity agriculture harbored 32 unique species. Of the species observed in primary forest, 80% had equal or greater abundance in low-intensity agricultural lands, underscoring the value of these lands in retaining diverse community assemblages at high densities in winter. Among disturbed landscapes, bird species richness and abundance declined as land-use intensity increased, especially in high-intensity pastures. Our results suggest that agricultural landscapes are important for most Himalayan bird species in winter. But agricultural intensification—especially increased grazing—will likely result in biodiversity losses. Given that forest reserves alone may inadequately conserve Himalayan birds in winter, comprehensive conservation strategies in the region must go beyond protecting intact primary forests and ensure that low-intensity agricultural lands are not extensively converted to high-intensity pastures.
AB - The impacts of land-use change on biodiversity in the Himalayas are poorly known, notwithstanding widespread deforestation and agricultural intensification in this highly biodiverse region. Although intact primary forests harbor many Himalayan birds during breeding, a large number of bird species use agricultural lands during winter. We assessed how Himalayan bird species richness, abundance, and composition during winter are affected by forest loss stemming from agriculture and grazing. Bird surveys along 12 elevational transects within primary forest, low-intensity agriculture, mixed subsistence agriculture, and intensively grazed pastures in winter revealed that bird species richness and abundance were greatest in low-intensity and mixed agriculture, intermediate in grazed pastures, and lowest in primary forest at both local and landscape scales; over twice as many species and individuals were recorded in low-intensity agriculture than in primary forest. Bird communities in primary forests were distinct from those in all other land-use classes, but only 4 species were unique to primary forests. Low-, medium-, and high-intensity agriculture harbored 32 unique species. Of the species observed in primary forest, 80% had equal or greater abundance in low-intensity agricultural lands, underscoring the value of these lands in retaining diverse community assemblages at high densities in winter. Among disturbed landscapes, bird species richness and abundance declined as land-use intensity increased, especially in high-intensity pastures. Our results suggest that agricultural landscapes are important for most Himalayan bird species in winter. But agricultural intensification—especially increased grazing—will likely result in biodiversity losses. Given that forest reserves alone may inadequately conserve Himalayan birds in winter, comprehensive conservation strategies in the region must go beyond protecting intact primary forests and ensure that low-intensity agricultural lands are not extensively converted to high-intensity pastures.
KW - agricultura
KW - agriculture
KW - bosque primario
KW - cambio en el uso de suelo
KW - grazing
KW - habitat disturbance
KW - land-use change
KW - las Himalayas
KW - pastoreo
KW - perturbación del hábitat
KW - primary forest
KW - the Himalayas
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000785135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85000785135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cobi.12812
DO - 10.1111/cobi.12812
M3 - Article
C2 - 27558794
AN - SCOPUS:85000785135
SN - 0888-8892
VL - 31
SP - 416
EP - 426
JO - Conservation Biology
JF - Conservation Biology
IS - 2
ER -