Abstract
In analyzing the IMF attempts to stabilize private capital flows, we contrast cases where banks and bondholders do the lending. Consistent with banks' natural advantage in monitoring, they reduce spreads as they obtain more information through repeat transactions with borrowers. By comparison, repeat borrowing has little influence in bond markets, where publicly-available information dominates. But spreads on bonds are lower when they are issued in conjunction with an IMF-supported program, as if the existence of a program conveys positive information to bondholders. The influence of IMF monitoring in bond markets is especially pronounced for countries vulnerable to liquidity crises.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1335-1357 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of Banking and Finance |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Capital market access
- IMF programs
- Signaling