TY - JOUR
T1 - The Evolution of Variance Control
AU - Bruijning, Marjolein
AU - Metcalf, C. Jessica E.
AU - Jongejans, Eelke
AU - Ayroles, Julien F.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Luisa Pallares and Simon Forsberg for helpful comments and discussions. This research was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health to J.F.A. ( R35 GM124881 and R01ES029929 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Genetically identical individuals can be phenotypically variable, even in constant environmental conditions. The ubiquity of this phenomenon, known as ‘intra-genotypic variability’, is increasingly evident and the relevant mechanistic underpinnings are beginning to be understood. In parallel, theory has delineated a number of formal expectations for contexts in which such a feature would be adaptive. Here, we review empirical evidence across biological systems and theoretical expectations, including nonlinear averaging and bet hedging. We synthesize existing results to illustrate the dependence of selection outcomes both on trait characteristics, features of environmental variability, and species’ demographic context. We conclude by discussing ways to bridge the gap between empirical evidence of intra-genotypic variability, studies demonstrating its genetic component, and evidence that it is adaptive.
AB - Genetically identical individuals can be phenotypically variable, even in constant environmental conditions. The ubiquity of this phenomenon, known as ‘intra-genotypic variability’, is increasingly evident and the relevant mechanistic underpinnings are beginning to be understood. In parallel, theory has delineated a number of formal expectations for contexts in which such a feature would be adaptive. Here, we review empirical evidence across biological systems and theoretical expectations, including nonlinear averaging and bet hedging. We synthesize existing results to illustrate the dependence of selection outcomes both on trait characteristics, features of environmental variability, and species’ demographic context. We conclude by discussing ways to bridge the gap between empirical evidence of intra-genotypic variability, studies demonstrating its genetic component, and evidence that it is adaptive.
KW - bet hedging
KW - intra-genotypic variability
KW - micro-environmental plasticity
KW - nonlinear averaging
KW - phenotypic variance
KW - vQTL
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071956831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071956831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.005
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31519463
AN - SCOPUS:85071956831
SN - 0169-5347
VL - 35
SP - 22
EP - 33
JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
IS - 1
ER -