TY - JOUR
T1 - The Double Tidal Disruption Event AT 2022dbl Implies that at Least Some “Standard” Optical Tidal Disruption Events Are Partial Disruptions
AU - Makrygianni, Lydia
AU - Arcavi, Iair
AU - Newsome, Megan
AU - Bandopadhyay, Ananya
AU - Coughlin, Eric R.
AU - Linial, Itai
AU - Mockler, Brenna
AU - Quataert, Eliot
AU - Nixon, Chris
AU - Godson, Benjamin
AU - Pursiainen, Miika
AU - Leloudas, Giorgos
AU - French, K. Decker
AU - Zitrin, Adi
AU - Faris, Sara
AU - Lam, Marco C.
AU - Horesh, Assaf
AU - Sfaradi, Itai
AU - Fausnaugh, Michael
AU - Nakar, Ehud
AU - Ackley, Kendall
AU - Andrews, Moira
AU - Charalampopoulos, Panos
AU - Davies, Benjamin D.R.
AU - Dgany, Yael
AU - Dyer, Martin J.
AU - Farah, Joseph
AU - Fender, Rob
AU - Green, David A.
AU - Howell, D. Andrew
AU - Killestein, Thomas
AU - Koivisto, Niilo
AU - Lyman, Joseph
AU - McCully, Curtis
AU - Mitchell, Morgan A.
AU - Padilla Gonzalez, Estefania
AU - Rhodes, Lauren
AU - Sahu, Anwesha
AU - Terreran, Giacomo
AU - Warwick, Ben
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Flares produced following the tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes can reveal the properties of the otherwise dormant majority of black holes and the physics of accretion. In the past decade, a class of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares has been discovered whose emission properties do not match theoretical predictions. This has led to extensive efforts to model the dynamics and emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruptions in order to establish them as probes of supermassive black holes. Here we present the optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption event AT 2022dbl, which showed a nearly identical repetition 700 days after the first flare. Ruling out gravitational lensing and two chance unrelated disruptions, we conclude that at least the first flare represents the partial disruption of a star, possibly captured through the Hills mechanism. Since both flares are typical of the optical-ultraviolet class of tidal disruptions in terms of their radiated energy, temperature, luminosity, and spectral features, it follows that either the entire class are partial rather than full stellar disruptions, contrary to the prevalent assumption, or some members of the class are partial disruptions, having nearly the same observational characteristics as full disruptions. Whichever option is true, these findings could require revised models for the emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares and a reassessment of their expected rates.
AB - Flares produced following the tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes can reveal the properties of the otherwise dormant majority of black holes and the physics of accretion. In the past decade, a class of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares has been discovered whose emission properties do not match theoretical predictions. This has led to extensive efforts to model the dynamics and emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruptions in order to establish them as probes of supermassive black holes. Here we present the optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption event AT 2022dbl, which showed a nearly identical repetition 700 days after the first flare. Ruling out gravitational lensing and two chance unrelated disruptions, we conclude that at least the first flare represents the partial disruption of a star, possibly captured through the Hills mechanism. Since both flares are typical of the optical-ultraviolet class of tidal disruptions in terms of their radiated energy, temperature, luminosity, and spectral features, it follows that either the entire class are partial rather than full stellar disruptions, contrary to the prevalent assumption, or some members of the class are partial disruptions, having nearly the same observational characteristics as full disruptions. Whichever option is true, these findings could require revised models for the emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares and a reassessment of their expected rates.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009982137
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009982137#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3847/2041-8213/ade155
DO - 10.3847/2041-8213/ade155
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105009982137
SN - 2041-8205
VL - 987
JO - Astrophysical Journal Letters
JF - Astrophysical Journal Letters
IS - 1
M1 - L20
ER -