The development of structural thinking about social categories

Nadya Vasilyeva, Alison Gopnik, Tania Lombrozo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Representations of social categories help us make sense of the social world, supporting predictions and explanations about groups and individuals. In an experiment with 156 participants, we explore whether children and adults are able to understand category-property associations (such as the association between "girls" and "liking pink") in structural terms, locating an object of explanation within a larger structure and identifying structural constraints that act on elements of the structure. We show that children as young as 3-4 years old show signs of structural thinking, and that 5-6-year-olds show additional differentiation between structural and nonstructural thinking, yet still fall short of adult performance. These findings introduce structural connections as a new type of nonaccidental relationship between a property and a category, and present a viable alternative to internalist accounts of social categories, such as psychological essentialism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1735-1744
Number of pages10
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume54
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Keywords

  • Category representation
  • Essentialism
  • Social categories
  • Structural explanation
  • Structural factors

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The development of structural thinking about social categories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this