Abstract
The "Number on the Forehead" model of multi-party communication complexity was first suggested by Chandra, Furst and Lipton. The best known lower bound, for an explicit function (in this model), is a lower bound of Ω(n/2k), where n is the size of the input of each player, and k is the number of players (first proved by Babai, Nisan and Szegedy). This lower bound has many applications in complexity theory. Proving a better lower bound, for an explicit function, is a major open problem. Based on the result of BNS, Chung gave a sufficient criterion for a function to have large multi-party communication complexity (up to Ω(n/2k)). In this paper, we use some of the ideas of BNS and Chung, together with some new ideas, resulting in a new (easier and more modular) proof for the results of BNS and Chung. This gives a simpler way to prove lower bounds for the multi-party communication complexity of a function.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 113-122 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Computational Complexity |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2000 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Theoretical Computer Science
- General Mathematics
- Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Computational Mathematics
Keywords
- Communication complexity
- Discrepancy