Abstract
Three studies suggest that individuals see the existence and operation of cognitive and motivational biases much more in others than in themselves. Study 1 provides evidence from three surveys that people rate themselves as less subject to various biases than the "average American, " classmates in a seminar, and fellow airport travelers. Data from the third survey further suggest that such claims arise from the interplay among availability biases and self-enhancement motives. Participants in one follow-up study who showed the better-than-average bias insisted that their self-assessments were accurate and objective even after reading a description of how they could have been affected by the relevant bias. Participants in a final study reported their peer's self-serving attributions regarding test performance to be biased but their own similarly self-serving attributions to be free of bias. The relevance of these phenomena to naïve realism and to conflict, misunderstanding, and dispute resolution is discussed. ̀ 2002 by the Society for Personality and social Psychology, Inc.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 369-381 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2002 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology