Testing the hubble law with the IRAS 1.2 Jy redshift survey

Daniel M. Koranyi, Michael A. Strauss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

We test and reject the claim of Segal and coworkers that the correlation of redshifts and flux densities in a complete sample of IRAS galaxies favors a quadratic redshift-distance relation over the linear Hubble law. This is done, in effect, by treating the entire galaxy luminosity function as derived from the 60 μm 1.2 Jy IRAS redshift survey of Fisher et al. as a distance indicator; equivalently, we compare the flux density distribution of galaxies as a function of redshift with predictions under different redshift-distance cosmologies, under the assumption of a universal luminosity function. This method does not assume a uniform distribution of galaxies in space. We find that this test has rather weak discriminatory power, as argued by Petrosian, and the differences between models are not as stark as one might expect a priori. Even so, we find that the Hubble law is indeed more strongly supported by the analysis than is the quadratic redshift-distance relation. We identify a bias in the Segal et al. determination of the luminosity function, which could lead one to mistakenly favor the quadratic redshift-distance law. We also present several complementary analyses of the density field of the sample; the galaxy density field is found to be close to homogeneous on large scales if the Hubble law is assumed, while this is not the case with the quadratic redshift-distance relation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-46
Number of pages11
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume477
Issue number1 PART I
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Keywords

  • Distance scale
  • Galaxies: distances and redshifts
  • Infrared: galaxies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the hubble law with the IRAS 1.2 Jy redshift survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this