TY - JOUR
T1 - Talking Up and Talking Down
T2 - The Power of Positive Speaking
AU - Fiske, Susan T.
AU - Bergsieker, Hilary
AU - Constantine, Vanessa
AU - Dupree, Cydney
AU - Holoien, Deborah S.
AU - Kervyn, Nicolas
AU - Leslie, Lisa
AU - Swencionis, Jill
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Consistent with Lewin's legacy and SPSSI's traditions, out work has focused on inequality and power dynamics between people. Drawing on interpersonal positivity biases, stereotype content emphasizing perceived warmth and competence, and on the compensation effect (trading off warmth and competence), we study how people communicate, understand, and present themselves and others, especially across status divides. First, polite communicators omit negativity in describing individuals, especially stereotyped ones. Negativity omission creates innuendo (its absence implies the negative information), which allows stereotype to stagnate. Listeners understand the innuendo and infer the negativity from its omission. Impression-managers understand this dynamic and use positive innuendo: They downplay one aspect (e.g., warmth or competence) to convey the other. Status determines which strategy people use: High-status speakers talk down (warmly), and low-status speakers talk up (competently). Cross-race interactions also show this dynamic. This creates dysfunctional inter-status interactions, the two people operating at crossed purposes.
AB - Consistent with Lewin's legacy and SPSSI's traditions, out work has focused on inequality and power dynamics between people. Drawing on interpersonal positivity biases, stereotype content emphasizing perceived warmth and competence, and on the compensation effect (trading off warmth and competence), we study how people communicate, understand, and present themselves and others, especially across status divides. First, polite communicators omit negativity in describing individuals, especially stereotyped ones. Negativity omission creates innuendo (its absence implies the negative information), which allows stereotype to stagnate. Listeners understand the innuendo and infer the negativity from its omission. Impression-managers understand this dynamic and use positive innuendo: They downplay one aspect (e.g., warmth or competence) to convey the other. Status determines which strategy people use: High-status speakers talk down (warmly), and low-status speakers talk up (competently). Cross-race interactions also show this dynamic. This creates dysfunctional inter-status interactions, the two people operating at crossed purposes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953387188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953387188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/josi.12152
DO - 10.1111/josi.12152
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84953387188
SN - 0022-4537
VL - 71
SP - 834
EP - 846
JO - Journal of Social Issues
JF - Journal of Social Issues
IS - 4
ER -