TY - JOUR
T1 - TALEN outperforms Cas9 in editing heterochromatin target sites
AU - Jain, Surbhi
AU - Shukla, Saurabh
AU - Yang, Che
AU - Zhang, Meng
AU - Fatma, Zia
AU - Lingamaneni, Manasi
AU - Abesteh, Shireen
AU - Lane, Stephan Thomas
AU - Xiong, Xiong
AU - Wang, Yuchuan
AU - Schroeder, Charles M.
AU - Selvin, Paul R.
AU - Zhao, Huimin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - Genome editing critically relies on selective recognition of target sites. However, despite recent progress, the underlying search mechanism of genome-editing proteins is not fully understood in the context of cellular chromatin environments. Here, we use single-molecule imaging in live cells to directly study the behavior of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN. Our single-molecule imaging of genome-editing proteins reveals that Cas9 is less efficient in heterochromatin than TALEN because Cas9 becomes encumbered by local searches on non-specific sites in these regions. We find up to a fivefold increase in editing efficiency for TALEN compared to Cas9 in heterochromatin regions. Overall, our results show that Cas9 and TALEN use a combination of 3-D and local searches to identify target sites, and the nanoscopic granularity of local search determines the editing outcomes of the genome-editing proteins. Taken together, our results suggest that TALEN is a more efficient gene-editing tool than Cas9 for applications in heterochromatin.
AB - Genome editing critically relies on selective recognition of target sites. However, despite recent progress, the underlying search mechanism of genome-editing proteins is not fully understood in the context of cellular chromatin environments. Here, we use single-molecule imaging in live cells to directly study the behavior of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN. Our single-molecule imaging of genome-editing proteins reveals that Cas9 is less efficient in heterochromatin than TALEN because Cas9 becomes encumbered by local searches on non-specific sites in these regions. We find up to a fivefold increase in editing efficiency for TALEN compared to Cas9 in heterochromatin regions. Overall, our results show that Cas9 and TALEN use a combination of 3-D and local searches to identify target sites, and the nanoscopic granularity of local search determines the editing outcomes of the genome-editing proteins. Taken together, our results suggest that TALEN is a more efficient gene-editing tool than Cas9 for applications in heterochromatin.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099905629
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099905629#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1038/s41467-020-20672-5
DO - 10.1038/s41467-020-20672-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 33504770
AN - SCOPUS:85099905629
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 12
JO - Nature communications
JF - Nature communications
IS - 1
M1 - 606
ER -