Taking risks behind the veil of ignorance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

A natural view in distributive ethics is that everyone’s interests matter, but the interests of the relatively worse off matter more than the interests of the relatively better off. I provide a new argument for this view. The argument takes as its starting point the proposal, due to Harsanyi and Rawls, that facts about distributive ethics are discerned from individual preferences in the “original position.” I draw on recent work in decision theory, along with an intuitive principle about risk taking, to derive the view.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-644
Number of pages35
JournalEthics
Volume127
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Taking risks behind the veil of ignorance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this